State v. Brooks Oral Argument set for September 11, 2013

The Minnesota Supreme Court today scheduled oral argument in State v. Brooks, for September 11, 2013. This case will likely address whether Minnesota’s Implied Consent law is constitutional and/or whether or not a DWI suspects ‘consent’ to take a blood, breath or urine test after being informed that they are required by law to take said test and it is a crime if they do not take said test, is valid consent pursuant to the 4th Amendment.

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this article does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Please contact attorney Kirk Anderson for an initial consultation.